<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>is my invention obvious?</title>
		<link>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/is-my-invention-obvious.htm</link>
		<description>is my invention obvious?</description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 19:42:27 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[When an invention is oveious it ]]></title>
				<link>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/is-my-invention-obvious.htm</link>
				<description><![CDATA[When an invention is oveious it has to do with someone who is versed&nbsp;in the art and if it would be ovious for them to see the modefication or not. I am not a patent attorney but I remember my attorney trying to teach me the difference so that I cou]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 19:42:27 GMT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/is-my-invention-obvious.htm#691495</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[If the innovations have no point]]></title>
				<link>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/is-my-invention-obvious.htm</link>
				<description><![CDATA[If the innovations have no points of similarity to the other device,
then the innovations should be subject to patent, or trademark, or
copyright, or whatever legal thing would apply. The innovations are one
thing, the overall device is another.
]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 19:42:27 GMT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/is-my-invention-obvious.htm#691494</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[OK well I know nothing about how]]></title>
				<link>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/is-my-invention-obvious.htm</link>
				<description><![CDATA[OK well I know nothing about how you`re determining this.I`m just wondering how the LeapPad`s patent didn`t hold up in court. Can ou explain?
]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 19:42:27 GMT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/is-my-invention-obvious.htm#691493</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[Obviousness IS defined as points]]></title>
				<link>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/is-my-invention-obvious.htm</link>
				<description><![CDATA[Obviousness IS defined as points of similarity.&nbsp; If the points of similarity between the claim and the prior art are such that "the combination of familiar elements according to known methods is likely to]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 19:42:27 GMT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/is-my-invention-obvious.htm#691492</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[If something is obvious it is no]]></title>
				<link>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/is-my-invention-obvious.htm</link>
				<description><![CDATA[If something is obvious it is not patentable.&nbsp; Are you saying the innovations found in leapPad are not patentable?]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 19:42:27 GMT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/is-my-invention-obvious.htm#691491</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[
I think "obvious" is a measure]]></title>
				<link>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/is-my-invention-obvious.htm</link>
				<description><![CDATA[
I think "obvious" is a measure, not an attribute, nor an entity. For
something to be obvious (self-evident), it must apply to the senses. In
other words, what is obvious is a measure of points of similarity,
perceived through the physical senses.]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 19:42:27 GMT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/is-my-invention-obvious.htm#691490</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[It`s a LeapPad, and that seems p]]></title>
				<link>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/is-my-invention-obvious.htm</link>
				<description><![CDATA[It`s a LeapPad, and that seems pretty damn obvious to me.I can`t believe that didn`t hold up in court.
]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 19:42:27 GMT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/is-my-invention-obvious.htm#691489</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[here`s what was written about th]]></title>
				<link>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/is-my-invention-obvious.htm</link>
				<description><![CDATA[here`s what was written about the product:
"The accused PowerTouch device consists of a hinged plastic housing containing electronics and a speaker that opens to lie flat. When so opened, a user places a book made for use with the device in a re]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 19:42:27 GMT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/is-my-invention-obvious.htm#691488</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[kindly offer a proposed definiti]]></title>
				<link>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/is-my-invention-obvious.htm</link>
				<description><![CDATA[kindly offer a proposed definition of obviousness for patent law.&nbsp; i agree that any legal test that relies on `common sense` is going to be very wishy washy.&nbsp; if a case really was so much `common sense` it would not be in court in the first place[...]]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 19:42:27 GMT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/is-my-invention-obvious.htm#691487</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[What was the product?
]]></title>
				<link>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/is-my-invention-obvious.htm</link>
				<description><![CDATA[What was the product?
]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 19:42:27 GMT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/is-my-invention-obvious.htm#691486</guid>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>