<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Financial / accounting site - critiques appreciated</title>
		<link>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/Financial--accounting-site---critiques-appreciated.htm</link>
		<description>Financial / accounting site - critiques appreciated</description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:54:27 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[Definitely like the revised vers]]></title>
				<link>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/Financial--accounting-site---critiques-appreciated.htm</link>
				<description><![CDATA[Definitely like the revised version better :-) I`m still bothered by two things.There are tons of accounting services "out there." I don`t yet see anything that distinguishes you from millions.Your mission is just feel-good fluff. ]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:54:27 GMT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/Financial--accounting-site---critiques-appreciated.htm#755334</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[
  Hi guys, 
  Thanks for the ]]></title>
				<link>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/Financial--accounting-site---critiques-appreciated.htm</link>
				<description><![CDATA[
  Hi guys, 
  Thanks for the helpful comments and suggestions. I plan to incorporate most of them into the site. 
  I`ve been getting a lot of comments that the original homepage was too packed with content. So I cleaned ]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:54:27 GMT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/Financial--accounting-site---critiques-appreciated.htm#755333</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[I`d put a more obvious link to t]]></title>
				<link>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/Financial--accounting-site---critiques-appreciated.htm</link>
				<description><![CDATA[I`d put a more obvious link to the FAQ. Footers are nice, but I wonder how many people actually pay much attention to them unless there`s a problem? I don`t, but that`s just me.Editors charge in various ways, usually per-word or flat rate per artic]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:54:27 GMT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/Financial--accounting-site---critiques-appreciated.htm#755332</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[
  Craig, thanks for the review]]></title>
				<link>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/Financial--accounting-site---critiques-appreciated.htm</link>
				<description><![CDATA[
  Craig, thanks for the review. You bring up a lot of great points.
  The site seems fine in FF 3.x. Haven`t yet tried FF 2.x or IE 6.x. IN any case, I agree with Jarrod that this probably isn`t a huge deal, considering the small number of use]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:54:27 GMT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/Financial--accounting-site---critiques-appreciated.htm#755331</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[:-) I think it comes down to the]]></title>
				<link>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/Financial--accounting-site---critiques-appreciated.htm</link>
				<description><![CDATA[:-) I think it comes down to the nature of the business...the company. We sell a tangible product, one product line, and it`s a small niche. So we tend to have a basic site, without compatibility problems. Other companies really do need to show by ]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:54:27 GMT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/Financial--accounting-site---critiques-appreciated.htm#755330</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[Sorry, i was just referring to t]]></title>
				<link>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/Financial--accounting-site---critiques-appreciated.htm</link>
				<description><![CDATA[Sorry, i was just referring to this particular statement:"Despite Steve`s curmudgeonly argument that NObody uses FireFox 2.x, or
IE 6.x, I actually do. I happen to like them, and I also think that
backward compatibility is a must in today`s tec]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:54:27 GMT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/Financial--accounting-site---critiques-appreciated.htm#755329</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[I wouldn`t argue about "blindly"]]></title>
				<link>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/Financial--accounting-site---critiques-appreciated.htm</link>
				<description><![CDATA[I wouldn`t argue about "blindly" getting exercised about backward compatibility. In fact, I don`t really care at all if developers ignore older browsers. My only purpose is to mention that there are problems in FireFox 2x, and IE6. If the c]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:54:27 GMT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/Financial--accounting-site---critiques-appreciated.htm#755328</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[I have to strongly disagree at b]]></title>
				<link>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/Financial--accounting-site---critiques-appreciated.htm</link>
				<description><![CDATA[I have to strongly disagree at blindly worrying about backward compatibility.
Backward compatibility is quite important... if needed. As an example, a moderate trafficked ecommerce site i run gets 17.55% of its visitors using firefox, out of that pe]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:54:27 GMT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/Financial--accounting-site---critiques-appreciated.htm#755327</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[
Hi Mike :-) Welcome to the com]]></title>
				<link>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/Financial--accounting-site---critiques-appreciated.htm</link>
				<description><![CDATA[
Hi Mike :-) Welcome to the community.Despite Steve`s curmudgeonly argument that NObody uses FireFox 2.x, or IE 6.x, I actually do. I happen to like them, and I also think that backward compatibility is a must in today`s tech world. As such, I saw]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:54:27 GMT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/Financial--accounting-site---critiques-appreciated.htm#755326</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[
  
    
      Hello everyone]]></title>
				<link>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/Financial--accounting-site---critiques-appreciated.htm</link>
				<description><![CDATA[
  
    
      Hello everyone,
    
  
  
    
      
        ]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:54:27 GMT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.startupnation.com/community/orca/topic/Financial--accounting-site---critiques-appreciated.htm#755325</guid>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>