Here is an interesting site: http://academicearth.org/ They have around a 1,000 lectures from Stanford/Harvard/etc professors alone on the subject of entrepreneurs/marketing. Some long, some just a few minutes.
I highly recommend browsing around and watching some.
I get all your points and thanks for the responses.
But the bottom line is that if these people are preaching "content is king" and "its all about inbound links" "keywords" then why can none of them over take a site like seo-usa.org which has only 260 pages, only 75 inbound links, and ZERO meta tags, no keywords, nothing? Even the majority of their text is in images.
I see your point with the not targeting for "SEO" generically. But we all know they would do anything to have that position for that term, they just dont have the knowledge to make it happen.cubemonkey1/24/2009 12:29 AM
If there are so many SEO experts out there, how come only 1 out of the top 5 results for SEO on Google is an actual SEO website? Aside from saying that you`re targeting "seo optimization techniques for blogs" and not "seo" because you know if you had plain old seo your business would increase 100 fold.
The leaders are:
seo-usa.org (which has nothing to do with SEO)
and the only real one from what I can tell: seochat.com
How can you optimize a site for a keyword if you can`t do it for your own?