Find us elsewhere
Join Now Member Login

Strategy Section

 
New Topic
Post Reply
Follow Topic
« Prev Page of 3
  • Author
  • Message
 
crazydiamond

posts: 38

Jul 08, 2007 6:02 PM ET    Quote  Report Abuse
Points: 0   Vote
Well, I go along with Craig to an extent, but I guess I come at it from a slightly different perspective.
To me, the strategic level is best defined as what you are, and tactical is how you behave. This goes hand in hand with the military adage that strategy is what you do when you are NOT in contact with the enemy. Tactics - you are engaged with the enemy.

Lets take the human being. The human being is a chaos machine that has some fairly significant ability to define itself - physically, emotionally (emotional management), spiritually, and cognitively. The set of world views and mental maps that you have developed, through education, and experience define you in many ways. How you comprehend the world, what your level of understanding of other people is, how you organize information to extract meaning and wisdom... How well you learn, and from what media and sources, is  a major component of who you are.
Tactics are how you behave when confronted with a situation - what actions you take, what decisions you are likely to reach, what words you use.

Here`s the thing. Tactics are governed by strategy. Having adopted a strategy to be very very big, means that one is unlikely to successfully execute ballet steps, hide under the sofa, or escape through a crack in the wall. That is why elephants rarely do the two-step.

Adopting a strategy  means taking those steps that define the range of tactics that your business CAN adopt, and your likelihood of successful executing those tactics. Designing a strategy means assessing what you currently are, what tactics you see as valuable options over a given time span, and re-designing yourself to bring those tactical capabilities into your organization. It is very difficult to do this when you are already engaged with the competition. That is why these steps are taken when you are NOT engaged - before the engagement. If not, it is likely to be too late.

Concrete example.
Let`s say your business model for selling your software is reliant on distribution through schools to create familiarity and pre-disposition to use your product amongst graduates. You offer a very strong product that is complementary with and supported by the back-of the-house offerings that large organizations want - say a development platform, a database product, and a web server. Your strategy is creating assets that make infiltrating education sector. you have a board member who is an ex-secretary of Education. You have a product designer who holds a PHD in learning. Your tactic might be predatory pricing and bundled selling.
You decide that it is unnecessary to have quality sources of competitive information amongst those strange whack-a-loons who write code in their basements in their underwear. I mean, come on, they cannot be taken seriously - this is a multi-billion dollar business here, that is global in scope. So you do NOT have a strategic element for war gaming using competitive intelligence that includes non-commercial entrants.
One day you wake up, and you are not only the target of a anti-monopoly action, but you are also under pressure to conform to open standards. Why is that? Well seems those strange people have written a  FREE product that offers much the same functionality as your product, and also inter-operates with your file structures. Suddenly, your strategic plan has left you in a position where your tactic of predatory pricing is simply not viable. How do you ruthlessly price out of existence someone`s FREE product?
Even worse, your strategy of implementing through school channels has been undercut. Your technical and support and sales staff, all tied into that channel, cannot convince the local school board to pay money for a product that they can get for free.

Strategy - define what you are, and constantly re-invent yourself.
Tactics - the range of behaviors that you can successfully deploy.

for what its worth...



-------------------------

Need help with your bootstrap business?
Check out The Harbour Forum for advice from dedicated staff in a secure environment and fellow entrepreneurs
CraigL

posts: 9051

Jul 09, 2007 12:51 AM ET    Quote  Report Abuse
Points: 0   Vote
.....hand in hand with the military adage that strategy is what you do when you are NOT in contact with the enemy. Tactics - you are engaged with the enemy.

Here`s the thing. Tactics are governed by strategy.

I totally love this! :-D Mind if I steal it?

From what you`ve writ above in regard to a human being (the chaos machine), we could shift over into the concepts of morality and ethics. Morality is the strategy, and ethics are the tactics.

However, the "flavor" of the words strategy and tactics carry with them the implication that the underlying cause of actions is the human being.

Strategy isn`t as complex and all-encompassing as a morality. Likewise, a strategy ordinarily would be constrained by a particular field of endeavor. Whereas a morality is global, and is meant to inform the ethical actions throughout an entire life, across an unknown number of new experiences.

The key point, I think, is that people nowadays really don`t understand the meaning of the word "define." Over the past 200 years, it`s come to mean a sort of "feeling" of what a word means to each individual person. Definitions, to many people, are held as stories and anecdotes, examples they make up about their own encounter with the word and concept.

So too, "strategy" not only requires its own definition, but as you`ve pointed out it`s a form of living, actionable definition---the defining of the business. For those people who understand the purpose of objective definitions, there`s also not much of a problem with strategic thinking.

However, as you can see on these forums, for those who "feel" their way through definitions, there`s clearly a need for some education on the concept of strategy, and it`s related word, tactics. :-)
CraigL2007-7-9 0:56:15
guerino1

posts: 1

Jul 09, 2007 7:39 AM ET    Quote  Report Abuse
Points: 0   Vote
Hello All,

I`m new so please bear with me.  Since you`re talking about the addition of sections to the forum, like one for Strategy, have you thought about potentially breaking sections out into the basic areas that are common to all enterprises:

- Globalization & International Markets
- Human Resources & People
- Marketing & Public Relations
- M&As & Financing
- Operations & Legal
- Research, Development & Manufacturing
- Sales & Distribution
- Services & Support
- Strategy & Leadership
- Technology & Tools
- Training, Education, & Knowledge Management

Anyhow, I hope this helps.

My Best,

Frank Guerino, CEO
TraverseIT
Frank.Guerino@TraverseIT.com
http://www.TraverseIT.com

CraigL

posts: 9051

Jul 09, 2007 3:46 PM ET    Quote  Report Abuse
Points: 0   Vote
Frank,
Those are great ideas. They`d make excellent topics, all of which could be held under the single topical heading of Strategy--Long-term Planning for your Business. Wouldn`t you agree? (Not on the actual title...just that the underlying components can be done as topic titles.)
« Prev Page of 3
Post Reply
 
.
Advertisement

Keep the Community Clean!

  • StartupNation forums should be used as a platform to learn, educate others, share stories, tips & tricks and to provide constructive feedback.
  • Please do not use the Forums for advertising & blatant self-promotion.
  • Please be respectful to other members and refrain from personal attacks and vulgar language.
  • StartupNation reserves the right to delete any message, reply, and/or member who violates our terms of use.
Read full terms of use
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement