Find us elsewhere
Join Now Member Login

Startup Compensation for a Web Engineer

 
New Topic
Post Reply
Follow Topic
Page of 1
  • Author
  • Message
 
digitalage

posts: 1

Mar 05, 2008 12:42 AM ET    Quote  Report Abuse
Points: 0   Vote
I just joined a startup as a Web Engineer.  There are now two founders and two engineers.  The startup is in the Web 2.0 space, has only been around for a few months, and has no financial backing.

The two founders have allocated a million shares of stock.  Both of them hold just under two-thirds of this amount and have planned for one-third to be given to investors.  As compensation, they have offered me a complete stock package of 1.5% of all shares.  The plan does not include a hourly wage or a salary.  This type of compensation will be available when we get founding.

I`m new to this scene, so I have no experience to draw from and have the following questions:
* Does their stock allocation plan make sense to you?  What is a common plan for startups?
* Re: my compensation, do I deserve more stock?  If so, what do you think is fair?
* What kind of compensation package is typical for an engineer that hops on board very early on in the life of a startup?

Their math doesn`t add up to me.  I feel that they should take a smaller percentage of all shares so that there`s a larger percentage to give to investors.  I also feel like I deserve more than 1.5% of all stocks, especially when you take into consideration the number of investment rounds needed for a successful startup and the resulting delution.

Since I`ve never joined a startup before and have never been offered a complete stock package for compensation, I will appreciate all advice and comments.

Thanks.

digitalage3/5/2008 12:46 AM
Loren

posts: 242

Mar 05, 2008 3:02 AM ET    Quote  Report Abuse
Points: 0   Vote
yeah, you are getting screwed.
 
I hate to be a nay-sayer but its real easy for idea-men to push
around the craftsmen who make things happen.
 
Don`t work for free. There are plenty of great-looking sites
out there that aren`t making a dime and some of them were no
doubt built by fast-talking guys who talked talented tech people
like you into working for free... for the day when people started
not only showing-up... but buying what the site sells (and these
two factors are very, very different things).
 
Social networking sites, et al.  take a lot of work to build... and
many of them will both never be very profitable and never
even get very popular.
 
You should be getting paid for your expertise... and if you are really
good I don`t know why you aren`t engineering your own money-machines...
reliable little robots that bring you cash instead of IOUs.
benmunoz

posts: 1

Apr 02, 2008 1:31 PM ET    Quote  Report Abuse
Points: 0   Vote
You are getting screwed.  I`m both an MBA and former engineer.  You are a technical co-founder, so you should get something slightly less than them.  4 co-founders - maybe 30/30/20/20 with no investors.  If investors take half for their contribution, everyone gets diluted equally. 

Cofounders: 15/15/10/10
Investors: 50

If they can get funding to pay you market wage, then you aren`t really a technical co-founder, you are an employee, so market wage plus 1.5% makes more sense. 

If you`re taking on the risk (no funding), then you should get the reward (10-15% equity).  If you`re taking on little risk (decent salary), then you should get little reward (2% equity).
Page of 1
Post Reply
 
.
Advertisement

Keep the Community Clean!

  • StartupNation forums should be used as a platform to learn, educate others, share stories, tips & tricks and to provide constructive feedback.
  • Please do not use the Forums for advertising & blatant self-promotion.
  • Please be respectful to other members and refrain from personal attacks and vulgar language.
  • StartupNation reserves the right to delete any message, reply, and/or member who violates our terms of use.
Read full terms of use
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement