Some of the buttons worked quickly. Others, like the "Prints &
More" took forever to load. Then, when I got to that page, I clicked on
an image and it too, took a very long time to load.
I get the idea that you don`t have a lot of money for a developer. But
the problems you`re dealing with are about how to make pages load
faster, how to make the site design pleasing to the viewer, and so
forth.
In my opinion, rather than going for clever gimmicks as you`re learning
how to code a site, go with something easier to use instead. After all,
what do you want to do for the rest of your life---be a Web page
developer or a photographer?
There wasn`t any written content to make you a person, to make you
interesting, or to build a relationship with me as I looked at the
site. It was "just another image gallery" from what I saw.
Personally, I think you`d do much better to use a basic template for
the site, but spend your time writing better and better, interesting
content. Not many people really care that much about the aesthetics of
the site, excepting when they`re really annoying. Instead, I think
people are captured by the meaning of the words they`re reading.
Someone, a while back, brought out two basic concepts for a Web site:
- Customer journey -- the path you lead the viewer to follow as they enter your site,
- Call to action -- the stop points throughout the site where you try to engage the viewer in some way.
I see neither concept really taking place on the site. It`s partly the
big buttons, but they`re not all that terrible. It`s that they`re
taking the place of the actual content. Even so, why am I looking at
that content? See?
CraigL2007-4-1 18:30:4