The syndicate may very well have to be involved. It depends upon the contract between the cartoonist and the syndicate. It used to be that the syndicates owned all the copyrights to the strip and characters and made all decisions. In the last decade or so, many of those rights have been transfered back to the cartoonist, but on certain terms. But this is not the case with all strips. Older, more established strips still run under some of the old terms. I believe product licensing rights these days commonly belong to the cartoonist but that isn`t always the case. And sometimes the syndicate is still involved.
Bill Waterson is strictly against Calvin and Hobbes merchandising and holds all those rights so nobody will make Hobbes dolls. Jim Davis can`t get enough Garfield stuff out there and had to purchase all the rights back from the syndicate. Peanuts licensing has always been done through United Media Syndicate and one can only assume Schulz was good with it or he`d have bought back that control. He certainly had the leverage.
You will have to do some research to find out who owns the characters for licensing. Then contact those appropriate people, whether it be the cartoonist, syndicate or even a third party company.
And sure, add me as a buddy. Thanks!
-------------------------
Home Sweetest Home - Poster-Style Home Portraits
Zingerding - the Internet`s Funny Pages (coming soon!)
Steve Lowtwa