Dec.
8 (Bloomberg) -- CompUSA, the computer retailer that Mexican
billionaire Carlos Slim owned since 2000, will shut its doors after 23
years, succumbing to competition from Best Buy Co. and Wal-Mart Stores
Inc.
(more at link...)
(more at link...)
I shopped at CompUSA before Best Buy came to the Midwest, and before Wal-Mart carried much in the way of computers. In fact, there weren`t any stores that really focused on computers and software, so CompUSA sort of had a lock on the market.
I always felt I`d gotten good value for what I paid, and found many of the products I wanted on the shelves. Quality, in relation to Best Buy, convinced me I would shop at CompUSA rather than the deep discount stores. Customer service was pretty okay, and they had repair techs right there.
So how come the company is going out of business? What exactly does that mean: "competition from...?"
I also stopped shopping at CompUSA several years ago, but not at all because of the store or the prices. Some of it was convenience, having to drive a ways, but the much larger part is that I have a quality machine and it doesn`t really need to be changed much.
When I`ve wanted various new toys, accessories, or peripherals, they mostly have been available online, or through places like eBay and other used item locations. Wouldn`t that mean that competition from online shopping locations matters?
What about Tiger Direct, Global Computers, and Dell? And what does this mean for the brick-and-mortar computer store?
I`ll propose that the closing of CompUSA is representative of the overall concept of competition in retail. Did the company fail to compete? Yes, I get that Bloomberg is *saying* that`s the cause of the closure, but does your critical analysis agree with Bloomberg?
What do you think competition means in today`s new world of online outlets and secondhand merchandise sources?



